NRMP Match Statistics 2010: Percentage of International Medical Graduates (IMGs) Matched in 2010 (By Specialty) - USMLE Forums
USMLE Forums Logo
USMLE Forums         Your Reliable USMLE Online Community     Members     Posts
Home
USMLE Articles
USMLE News
USMLE Polls
USMLE Books
USMLE Apps
Go Back   USMLE Forums > IMG/FMG Forum

IMG/FMG Forum International Medical Graduates Forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Thanked 5,053 Times in 1,567 Posts
Reputation: 5149
Stats NRMP Match Statistics 2010: Percentage of International Medical Graduates (IMGs) Matched in 2010 (By Specialty)

I've been looking at the NRMP Match Statistics for the year 2010 which is available on the net here http://www.nrmp.org/data/resultsanddata2010.pdf

If you go to table 1 in that document you won't see the percent of IMGs filling positions. Therefore, what I did is the following, I extrapolated the percentage of matched IMGs using the following formula:
(Total number of applicants - Total number of US Senior applicants) divided by (Total number of matched applicants - Total number of matched US Seniors) X 100%
I've done that for each specialty and then sorted out the results from the most IMG-friendly (highest IMG matching percentage) to the least.

Here's the list:

Pediatrics-Emergency Medicine------66.67%
Emergency Medicine----------------50.07%
Pediatrics--------------------------37.84%
Obstetrics-Gynecology-------------35.98%
Internal Medicine (Categorical)------35.00%
Otolaryngology---------------------33.33%
Surgery-Preliminary (PGY-1 Only)-----32.27%
Family Medicine---------------------31.82%
Pathology---------------------------31.78%
Psychiatry (Categorical)------------30.52%
Anesthesiology-----------------------28.94%
Neurology-----------------------------28.75%
Orthopedic Surgery--------------------28.21%
Dermatology--------------------------26.09%
Plastic Surgery (Integrated)-----------25.00%
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation------21.47%
Medicine-Pediatrics-------------------20.59%
Emergency Medicine/Family Medicine---18.75%
Surgery (Categorical)-----------------18.39%
Transitional (PGY-1 Only)--------------16.69%
Medicine-Psychiatry-------------------16.67%
Radiology-Diagnostic------------------16.38%
Medicine-Preliminary (PGY-1 Only)------15.85%
Psychiatry-Neurology------------------15.38%
Neurological Surgery-------------------15.31%
Preventive Medicine-------------------12.50%
Peds/Psych/Child Psychiatry-----------10.00%
Psychiatry-Family Medicine-------------9.09%
Medicine-Family Medicine---------------8.33%
Thoracic Surgery----------------------8.00%
Radiation Oncology--------------------7.69%
Medicine-Emergency Medicine----------7.50%
Medicine-Primary-----------------------6.21%
Vascular Surgery-----------------------6.06%
Pediatrics-Primary Care-----------------5.97%
Medicine-Preventive Medicine-----------4.11%
Medicine-Dermatology------------------0.00%
Medicine-Medical Genetics--------------0.00%
Medicine-Neurology---------------------0.00%
Pediatrics-Medical Genetics-------------0.00%
Urology--------------------------------0.00%

Total----------------------------------28.66%

Example explanation: In categorical Internal Medicine there were 3194 US senior applicants and 9552 total applicants of which 2722 US Seniors matched and 4947 total matched. Applying these numbers in the formula means;
(9552-3194) / (4947-2722) X 100% == 35% of IMGs who applied to IM were able to match.


Will be doing the same for the 2011 results this March or April.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

1) The calculation I used (Total - US seniors) does not necessarily yield IMGs only. Because there other categories that are not US seniors, such as US Osteopathic applicants, US graduates, and 5th pathway applicants. Also, many experts consider Caribbean graduates and US citizen who are IMGs at significant advantage over Non-US citizen graduates. However, the percentages listed above should largely represent non-US IMGs as they make up the majority of that section.

2) There are other issues that we should consider. The NRMP Match data does not include the prematch and postmatch (scramble) data. Therefore, in reality, these numbers might be little bit higher than what's listed here because many IMGs make it into residency via out-side-the-match offers.

3) The NRMP data list applicants whenever they rank that specialty. But the fact that many many applicants do apply to other specialties therefore, making the percentages mentioned here fairly inaccurate. However, I still believe the sequence from the most difficult to the least difficult specialty for IMG should be reasonably accurate regardless of the potential error in each individual percentage.

4) I think the reason why we see Otolaryngology and Orthopedics at comparatively less competitive levels is that IMGs have learnd the lesson and they realize their potential so those with low scores and non-surgical experience stopped applying to surgical specialties and therefore only those with very high scores and surgical experience have applied and this is what made the ranking of these specialties higher in the list.

5) The sample size in some of the rare specialties (such as Peds ER and genetics) is very low making the statistical significance of these numbers very low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The above post was thanked by:
1TA2B (01-21-2011), Amenah (01-08-2011), appu (04-07-2011), Appy (11-11-2011), ashishkabir (01-08-2011), ayash (01-09-2011), cool_atomic (01-09-2011), dazzles (01-08-2011), dr.Zh (12-28-2013), hedihav_x (01-08-2011), hypermedic (01-08-2011), imcv (09-21-2011), kieffer (01-08-2011), lateus (01-08-2011), lautareses (09-15-2014), Legendary (01-09-2011), Mahony87 (03-20-2011), mary (01-08-2011), Mondoshawan (02-12-2011), MWM1988 (01-08-2011), na1234 (01-09-2011), NAZIAMK (10-11-2011), nsesereso (03-19-2013), Pixie (01-09-2011), pkul85 (03-01-2013), Richa (01-20-2011), robinssmc (12-05-2011), Sachiko (02-25-2011), Shimche0244 (01-21-2011), swwal (07-19-2013), tamta (08-10-2013), tkourkou (01-09-2011), Usmle 9 (10-11-2011), USMLE-Syndrome (01-08-2011), weimingyuclsabc (04-12-2011), WSeagull (04-26-2012)



  #2  
Old 01-08-2011
Shibtag's Avatar
USMLE Forums Scout
 
Steps History: Not yet
Posts: 26
Threads: 4
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Reputation: 25
Default

?? Table 2 DOES show figures for US IMGs and Non US IMGs!

Would it not be better to do: Number of Non-US IMGs matched / (Total number of applicants - Number of US Seniors) x 100 ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 01-08-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Thanked 5,053 Times in 1,567 Posts
Reputation: 5149
Default I meant Table-1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shibtag View Post
?? Table 2 DOES show figures for US IMGs and Non US IMGs!

Would it not be better to do: Number of Non-US IMGs matched / (Total number of applicants - Number of US Seniors) x 100 ?
I apologize. I meant Table-1. (I corrected the first post)
Table-2 is not helpful because it just shows who filled the positions it does not tell us how many applied so that we know the percentage of IMGs matched, therefore I am deleting your other post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
  #4  
Old 01-08-2011
kieffer's Avatar
USMLE Forums Scout
 
Steps History: Step 1 Only
Posts: 16
Threads: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Reputation: 22
Thumbs Up Great list

This is what I have been looking for long time ago. Thank you very much Step Taker,
now we know what is easy and what is hard to get
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 01-08-2011
Amenah's Avatar
USMLE Forums Addict
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS
Posts: 160
Threads: 15
Thanked 77 Times in 57 Posts
Reputation: 88
Default thanks

thanks a lot step taker . i was looking for this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 01-08-2011
USMLE Forums Guru
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS
Posts: 433
Threads: 52
Thanked 388 Times in 148 Posts
Reputation: 398
Default ???

internal medicine 35% and orthopedics 28 %

the difference isn't that big...so this means that getting a spot in ortho or internal medicine is almost equal in difficulty? both are even higher percentage than surgery?

i really don't understand this point
__________________
You miss 100% of the shots you don't take
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 01-08-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Thanked 5,053 Times in 1,567 Posts
Reputation: 5149
Default I was surprised like you but here's what I think the reason is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by hypermedic View Post
internal medicine 35% and orthopedics 28 %

the difference isn't that big...so this means that getting a spot in ortho or internal medicine is almost equal in difficulty? both are even higher percentage than surgery?

i really don't understand this point
As I explained in the first post. The reason why these numbers of what we used to know as highly competitive specialties appeared high is perhaps due to the fact that IMGs have learned the lesson and they don't apply to highly competitive specialties and only those with very high scores, USCE, research, US passport, ...etc apply to such specialties and therefore the percentages appeared skewed.
This is a sampling bias as we called in statistics. In other words if you go check for coronary heart disease in people who are old, obese, family history, ...etc you'll find the percentage very higher than what's there in the population at large.
I was surprised just like, but I double and triple checked the numbers myself and everytime I apply the formula I get the same percentages.
Please go and check the original data http://www.nrmp.org/data/resultsanddata2010.pdf and check if I have made any mistakes in the calculation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The above post was thanked by:
Jeesan (01-19-2011), NAZIAMK (10-11-2011), tamta (08-10-2013)
  #8  
Old 01-09-2011
cool_atomic's Avatar
USMLE Forums Guru
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS
Posts: 472
Threads: 29
Thanked 224 Times in 135 Posts
Reputation: 247
Correct Answer

what percentage of residents in your estimation may have been prematched in internal medicine? scramble had only about 5 places available for IM in 2010 and neglecting it, what % of total PGY-1 IM residents were offered prematch? Is there any way to know this kinda stuff?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 01-09-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Thanked 5,053 Times in 1,567 Posts
Reputation: 5149
Default There's no prematch data

Quote:
Originally Posted by cool_atomic View Post
what percentage of residents in your estimation may have been prematched in internal medicine? scramble had only about 5 places available for IM in 2010 and neglecting it, what % of total PGY-1 IM residents were offered prematch? Is there any way to know this kinda stuff?
As I mentioned in the first post. The data from NRMP does not include prematches. Prematches are given outside the NRMP match and there's no means by which we can measure such data.
Generally speaking, however, prematch offers are becoming less and less because programs are able to fill their positions by the main match due to thousands of applicants and they don't need to give prematch. However, I personally know of four friends who signed prematch offer in IM this year.
The percentages listed above do not include prematch data. Which means it should even go higher if we were to include the prematch. Like for example in Internal Medicine it might perhaps jump to 40% if we were able to include the prematch also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 01-09-2011
cool_atomic's Avatar
USMLE Forums Guru
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS
Posts: 472
Threads: 29
Thanked 224 Times in 135 Posts
Reputation: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StepTaker View Post
As I mentioned in the first post. The data from NRMP does not include prematches. Prematches are given outside the NRMP match and there's no means by which we can measure such data.
Generally speaking, however, prematch offers are becoming less and less because programs are able to fill their positions by the main match due to thousands of applicants and they don't need to give prematch. However, I personally know of four friends who signed prematch offer in IM this year.
The percentages listed above do not include prematch data. Which means it should even go higher if we were to include the prematch. Like for example in Internal Medicine it might perhaps jump to 40% if we were able to include the prematch also.
Hi steptaker:
One more question. The charting outcomes (links mentioned here) of the match shows the mean step-1 scores of those who matched vs. those who didn't. Currently, the avg scores for those who matched stands at 222 and those who didn't match is 209. Does this mean that anybody under 209 didn't match? I'm concerned because i have a 204/84 in step-1 Please advise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 01-09-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Thanked 5,053 Times in 1,567 Posts
Reputation: 5149
Default You should not worry

Quote:
Originally Posted by cool_atomic View Post
Hi steptaker:
One more question. The charting outcomes (links mentioned here) of the match shows the mean step-1 scores of those who matched vs. those who didn't. Currently, the avg scores for those who matched stands at 222 and those who didn't match is 209. Does this mean that anybody under 209 didn't match? I'm concerned because i have a 204/84 in step-1 Please advise.
Average means there's a range above and below. So at 222 average, there's probably a range from 182 to 262. So you will fall in that range and you can match.
Moreover, the fact that the difference between matchers (222) and non-matchers (209) averages is not that significant. Which means there are other criteria that plays role in determining those who match and those do not match. I refer you to this thread:
http://www.usmle-forums.com/residenc...g-filters.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The above post was thanked by:
cool_atomic (01-09-2011)
  #12  
Old 01-10-2011
shameldiesel's Avatar
USMLE Forums Scout
 
Steps History: 1 + CS
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Reputation: 20
Default The Number of prematches & postmatches

I think we can know the number of out-of-the-match IMG residents by subtracting the number of matched IMGs from the total number of IMGs entering the pipeline

And we can know the total number of IMGs entering the pipeline from the Data resource book published by the ACGME http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/databook/dat_index.asp (This book is released after the end of the academic year. ie. The most recent book reflects the results of 2009's Match)



From this figure we see that the total number of IMGs got residencies in 2009-2010 was 7144

And the number of IMGs (including US IMGs) matched in 2009 was 4731

So, the number of out-of-the-match positions = 7144 - 4731 = 2413

It's quite a big number... If anyone sees that I made a mistake in calculations or misunderstood anything, please correct me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The above post was thanked by:
cool_atomic (01-10-2011), Sabio (01-10-2011)
  #13  
Old 01-10-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,316
Threads: 170
Thanked 4,921 Times in 1,809 Posts
Reputation: 4974
Default Where did you get the second number?

Quote:
Originally Posted by shameldiesel View Post
From this figure we see that the total number of IMGs got residencies in 2009-2010 was 7144

And the number of IMGs (including US IMGs) matched in 2009 was 4731

So, the number of out-of-the-match positions = 7144 - 4731 = 2413

It's quite a big number... If anyone sees that I made a mistake in calculations or misunderstood anything, please correct me.
Where did you get the second number (4731) from? According to the NRMP data referenced by StepTaker above, the number of matched US and non-US IMGs residents was 7401 in the year 2009-2010 which is the same year you are referring to in the ACGME data.
The NRMP data cannot be compared to the ACGME data for a simple reason, there are residents matching into PGY2 (advanced programs) and they are included in the calculation while the ACGME data takes a look at all the residents at all PGY1,2,3,..etc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old 01-11-2011
shameldiesel's Avatar
USMLE Forums Scout
 
Steps History: 1 + CS
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Reputation: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabio View Post
Where did you get the second number (4731) from? According to the NRMP data referenced by StepTaker above, the number of matched US and non-US IMGs residents was 7401 in the year 2009-2010 which is the same year you are referring to in the ACGME data.
The NRMP data cannot be compared to the ACGME data for a simple reason, there are residents matching into PGY2 (advanced programs) and they are included in the calculation while the ACGME data takes a look at all the residents at all PGY1,2,3,..etc

First, the second number (4731) is the sum of US IMGs & non-US IMGs matched to PGY1 in 2009


While the number you are posting (7401) is the number of non-US seniors matched in PGY1 & PGY2 in 2010 (including osteo, 5th pathway, canadian, US IMGs & non-US IMGs)



Second, the figure I am posting from ACGME statistics is only about residents in PGY1 excluding preliminary positions. (I guess if we add preliminary positions, it will be a bigger number)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old 01-13-2011
good_boy_1234's Avatar
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1 + CS
Posts: 546
Threads: 91
Thanked 322 Times in 145 Posts
Reputation: 368
Default

Oh Thank you StepTaker...you did a great job.

Someone would say oh may god..Dermatology & Plastic are easier than General Surgery for IMGs!!

No, it doesn't work like that. It is because the number of Dermatology & Plastic Sur seats are far lesser than that for Surgery.
In other words, just an example:
If there are 10 seats of Derma in U.S & 2 IMGs got 2 seats of those 10.
Then the IMG percent would be 20%
Where as If we suppose there are 100 seats of General Surgery in U.S & 10 IMGs got 10 seats of those 100, Then IMG percent would be 10%

So the number is misleading a bit because the big issue is the number of seats...Since when seats of such speciality are
less than other speciality means the former is more competitive than the latter even between AMGs.

I think this clarification is important
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The above post was thanked by:
Chessmatic (01-13-2011), hedihav_x (01-13-2011), hypermedic (01-13-2011)



  #16  
Old 01-13-2011
Chessmatic's Avatar
USMLE Forums Addict
 
Steps History: Step 1 Only
Posts: 114
Threads: 5
Thanked 60 Times in 42 Posts
Reputation: 70
Smile It's mentioned by StepTaker

Quote:
Originally Posted by good_boy_1234 View Post
I think this clarification is important
I think the explanation number 4 given by StepTaker in the first post is the explanation to what you are saying
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #17  
Old 01-19-2011
USMLE Forums Newbie
 
Steps History: Step 1 Only
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Reputation: 10
Default hello

hello! i am scared that i got 86 in 1st step n second step not yet given. I don't know I may have chance of matching if i procceed further.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18  
Old 01-19-2011
cool_atomic's Avatar
USMLE Forums Guru
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS
Posts: 472
Threads: 29
Thanked 224 Times in 135 Posts
Reputation: 247
Correct Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Kapesh Kunwa View Post
hello! i am scared that i got 86 in 1st step n second step not yet given.i don't know i may have chance of matching if i procceed further.
that depends on many factors such as years since graduation, US clinical experience and other step scores, etc... But that too for progams like IM, FM and peds. I have an 84 on step-1 and am in the same track as yours. Aim for high 90's in step-2CK is all that i'm sure that'll get us into residency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #19  
Old 04-07-2011
USMLE Forums Addict
 
Steps History: CS Only
Posts: 109
Threads: 23
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Reputation: 33
Question IM vs EM

Hello,
I am tied between these two residency choices which I find impossible to decide.
The statistics given here are showing a higher percentage of EM match than IM. Which field has a better chance of getting matched?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #20  
Old 09-21-2011
USMLE Forums Addict
 
Steps History: Not yet
Posts: 104
Threads: 51
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Reputation: 20
Send a message via Skype™ to tarsuc
Default Emergency medicine?

Hi,

Im finding it a little difficult to understand the list, but is it safe to assume that more IMG's are being accepted to EM positions?

I personally havent heard of any IMG matching in EM?

Thoughts/Opinions please,

Thanx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #21  
Old 10-04-2011
USMLE Forums Master
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 1,175
Threads: 38
Thanked 854 Times in 478 Posts
Reputation: 864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by appu View Post
Hello,
I am tied between these two residency choices which I find impossible to decide.
The statistics given here are showing a higher percentage of EM match than IM. Which field has a better chance of getting matched?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarsuc View Post
Hi,

Im finding it a little difficult to understand the list, but is it safe to assume that more IMG's are being accepted to EM positions?

I personally havent heard of any IMG matching in EM?


Thoughts/Opinions please,

Thanx


Probably due to the lesser number of IMG's wanting to go into EM (i.e. Smaller Sample Size [n=<1]) this prematurely increases matching %.

EM is now more competitive imo as compared to good IM programs.

100 People applying for IM and 50 being accepted = 50%
10 People applying for EM and 8 getting in = 80%
__________________
PGY-3
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #22  
Old 12-05-2011
USMLE Forums Scout
 
Steps History: Step 1 Only
Posts: 32
Threads: 7
Thanked 40 Times in 11 Posts
Reputation: 50
Default I am scared

Honestly, these numbers gave me a real scare. I was counting on IM/FM thinking FM would be a little easier for IMGs to get into. I was wrong. Seriously, after a very poor (188/75) step 1 score, I don't know whether I should go for step 2 CK and aim for a dream residency in the US.

I am an IMG (Bangladesh, 2007), did MPH (Australia, 2009), one year fellowship in a US medical school which involved clinical observation, creating disease specific health literacy materials for the university hospital to be used by the hospital administration/ nurses/ doctors. Currently, involved in pandemic influenza research funded by the CDC in my own country. I will need a visa (J1/H1b) for the US.

I am dejected right now. Is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Will I be filtered out for this very very low step 1 score?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #23  
Old 01-28-2012
USMLE Forums Addict
 
Steps History: ---
Posts: 100
Threads: 34
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Reputation: 18
Default

hav u calculated such stats for 2011 match?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message



Reply

Tags
Match-2010, Match-Probability, NRMP-

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the USMLE Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Medical School
Choose "---" if you don't want to tell. AMG for US & Canadian medical schools. IMG for all other medical schools.
USMLE Steps History
What steps finished! Example: 1+CK+CS+3 = Passed Step 1, Step 2 CK, Step 2 CS, and Step 3.

Choose "---" if you don't want to tell.

Favorite USMLE Books
What USMLE books you really think are useful. Leave blank if you don't want to tell.
Location
Where you live. Leave blank if you don't want to tell.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How did you match in 2010? StepTaker IMG Residency Match Forum 6 08-05-2010 10:38 AM
Early Reports of the 2010 Match has been released Sabio IMG/FMG Forum 1 04-25-2010 07:45 AM
2010 Match: Unmatched Applicants Thread StepTaker IMG Residency Match Forum 5 03-19-2010 02:12 PM
how could i join the match on next sept. 2010 ghaleb IMG Residency Match Forum 1 01-06-2010 04:10 PM

RSS Feed
Find Us on Facebook
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

USMLE® & other trade marks belong to their respective owners, read full disclaimer
USMLE Forums created under Creative Commons 3.0 License. (2009-2014)