It's Official; Increased IMG Percentage Match in 2013 - USMLE Forums
USMLE Forums Logo
USMLE Forums         Your Reliable USMLE Online Community     Members     Posts
Home
USMLE Articles
USMLE News
USMLE Polls
USMLE Books
USMLE Apps
Go Back   USMLE Forums > USMLE News

USMLE News Interesting USMLE News and Events useful for the USMLE Student


Reply
 
News Tools Search this News Display Modes
 
Old
It's Official; Increased IMG Percentage Match in 2013
by drdhruv 03-21-2013, 08:23 AM

Hi all,

You all must have heard this news but for those who haven't and are scared about the future in Matching, being an IMG.
you can go through the official ECFMG announcement posted today March 21st 2013, and see for yourself.

Increased residency positions:
Quote:
For the eleventh consecutive year, the number of first-year (PGY-1) residency positions offered through the National Resident Matching Program® (NRMP®) Main Residency Match® increased. A total of 26,392 first-year positions were offered in the 2013 Match. This represents an increase of 2,358 positions compared to last year and an increase of nearly 5,800 positions since 2002.
Increase from 43.9% to 49.8% in the percentage of matched IMGs

Quote:
The number of IMGs who matched to first-year positions increased by 1,425 compared to 2012. Of the 12,683 IMGs who participated in the 2013 Match, 6,311 (49.8%) matched. In the 2012 Match, 4,886 (43.9%) IMGs were matched to first-year positions. (These data include a small number of Fifth Pathway applicants who participated in the 2013 and 2012 Matches.)
The 2012 percentage was discussed before here in USMLE News, here's the link IMG matching in 2012 remained the same

They also mentioned that the no Prematch Policy for this year could have impacted the higher IMG percentage

Quote:
The total number of IMGs who will fill PGY-1 positions for the 2013-2014 academic year may be higher than the number obtaining positions through the 2013 Match. Although the majority of PGY-1 positions in the United States are filled through the Match, in past years a significant number of IMG applicants obtained positions outside of the Match. For example, while 4,626 IMGs obtained PGY-1 positions through the 2011 Match, 6,754 IMGs entered PGY-1 for the 2011-2012 academic year. For the 2013 Match, the NRMP introduced an “All-In” policy. This policy requires that, to participate in the Match, programs must register and attempt to fill all of their residency positions through the Main Residency Match, or through another national matching plan. Programs must place all positions in the Match or no positions in the Match. This policy is a factor in the higher numbers, compared to last year, of both positions offered through the 2013 Match (up 2,358 or 9.8%) and the number of IMGs participating in the 2013 Match (up 1,549 or 13.9%). It also, presumably, reduced the number of positions available outside of the 2013 Match.
Dear IMGs, let's buckle up and work hard to get matched!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Views 10335 Comments 7

Total Comments 7

Comments

 
Old 03-21-2013
 
Steps History: 1 + CS
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Reputation: 10
False increase

This large increase is only because of the Americans who graduated from the Caribbeans and European universities!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Reputation: 5089
Quote:
Originally Posted by am_akshar View Post
This large increase is only because of the Americans who graduated from the Caribbeans and European universities!
It's the percentage of IMGs specifically (AMGs not included) that was increased from 43.9% to 49.8% read the second quote in the post above.

-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013
 
Steps History: Not yet
Posts: 183
Threads: 43
Reputation: 193
IMGs are all same!

Quote:
Originally Posted by am_akshar View Post
This large increase is only because of the Americans who graduated from the Caribbeans and European universities!
I dont think the so well educated PDs really discriminate IMG's from their country of origin. They just care about how much you know about US Health care system and what VISA do you possess. More you know about USHC and if you can have a good base to get a VISA easily, they don't mind whether you are from Europe or Asia.

Yeah, one more thing comes is about language especially English Accent, but I'm sure that should not be such a problem, as if you cant speak the local language then how can you even think to practice the HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICE in that place.

SO, I'm sorry but i don't really agree with your point!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013
 
Steps History: CS Only
Posts: 127
Threads: 8
Reputation: 53
.

Just read this email ..... so finally there is some good news for IMGs hope this increase continues in the coming years too ....All the best everyone
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 3,263
Threads: 147
Reputation: 5089
Quote:
Originally Posted by am_akshar View Post
This large increase is only because of the Americans who graduated from the Caribbeans and European universities!
I am sorry I missed on your point in my previous post. Now I understand what you meant.
Here's my reply;
The report also mentioned increased percentage of non-US citizens IMGs. So that excluded US citizen IMGs.
In addition, the report does not differentiate Caribbean from European from other IMG graduates, they are all considered in one category of IMGs. So it's impossible to tell whether the increase was from a particular sector of IMGs.

-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013
 
Steps History: Not yet
Posts: 5
Threads: 2
Reputation: 10
Exactly. Let's keep going!

Quote:
Originally Posted by StepTaker View Post
I am sorry I missed on your point in my previous post. Now I understand what you meant.
Here's my reply;
The report also mentioned increased percentage of non-US citizens IMGs. So that excluded US citizen IMGs.
In addition, the report does not differentiate Caribbean from European from other IMG graduates, they are all considered in one category of IMGs. So it's impossible to tell whether the increase was from a particular sector of IMGs.

-
Exactly. Let's keep going!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2014
 
Steps History: CS Only
Posts: 10
Threads: 1
Reputation: 10
yeah keep going that is good...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message



Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the USMLE Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Medical School
Choose "---" if you don't want to tell. AMG for US & Canadian medical schools. IMG for all other medical schools.
USMLE Steps History
What steps finished! Example: 1+CK+CS+3 = Passed Step 1, Step 2 CK, Step 2 CS, and Step 3.

Choose "---" if you don't want to tell.

Favorite USMLE Books
What USMLE books you really think are useful. Leave blank if you don't want to tell.
Location
Where you live. Leave blank if you don't want to tell.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



News Tools Search this News
Search this News:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


RSS Feed
Find Us on Facebook
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

USMLE® & other trade marks belong to their respective owners, read full disclaimer
USMLE Forums created under Creative Commons 3.0 License. (2009-2014)