USMLE Forums - View Single Post - Epidemiology & Biostatistics
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-11-2016
Kruno Kruno is offline
USMLE Forums Guru
 
Steps History: 1+CK+CS+3
Posts: 361
Threads: 49
Thanked 101 Times in 80 Posts
Reputation: 111
Default

example question from the EpiStats qbank.....

Brian Lee presents to the clinic with recurrent epigastric pain that occurs about two hours after eating. He attributes the pain to the stress associated with going to high school. After obtaining the relevant information from the history and physical examination, Dr. Turner suspects a helicobacter pylori infection and counsels her patient that ordering a stool antigen assay would be appropriate. Mr. Lee gives consent, but admits that he is a little confused about something. What he would like to know is why people sometimes sat that a negative test is a good thing. Dr. Turn explains that if an investigation is very sensitive, then a negative test simply means that the patient probably does not have the condition. In a hypothetical study, 252 out of 304 positive tests and 322 out of 368 negative tests were correct. Based on this information, what proportion of people with a helicobacter pylori infection would Dr. Turner tell her patient are correctly identified by the test?

A. 322/374
B. 252/304
C. 46/298
D. 252/298
__________________
Want to learn more?! Check out
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
for
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!!
Reply With Quote