is goljan pathology enough?

This is an everlasting question by Step 1 students )
I voted for Goljan :happy:

If you have time do both of them
If you don't have much time do Goljan only
If you have very little time do Kaplan only

kaplan is more thorough with the material, but goljan has more nomenclature and pathofiz. so in other words kaplan is more sensitive while goljan is more specific. but they complement each other well.

kaplan has the stupidest of the path material, u can fail if u didnt do goljan rr, believe me my friend said that...

Goljan with its audio lectures is more than enough!

kln and goljan audio lectures

hello..can any body tell me hows this combo kln and goljan audio notes?my aim is 250 plus..

first pathoma then goljan

I am going thru pathoma video and note,then same chapter on goljan..been very beneficial in terms of time consuming and memorizing!

pathology

doctorF said:

kaplan has the stupidest of the path material, u can fail if u didnt do goljan rr, believe me my friend said that...

Click to expand...

yup even i believe tht one.. it scares the **** out of me by lukn at a book tht slim !!

ks308147 said:

I am going thru pathoma video and note,then same chapter on goljan..been very beneficial in terms of time consuming and memorizing!

Click to expand...

Exactly what I am doing. When is your exam?

ks308147 said:

I am going thru pathoma video and note,then same chapter on goljan..been very beneficial in terms of time consuming and memorizing!

Click to expand...

Hey! Now that you gave yiur exam, do you think pathoma is important or makes a considerable difference? As i am doing Goljan only. Thanks