USMLE Forums banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
There seems to be a lot of comments from people who have taken the exam recently talking about too many Pics!!!
Any one who've had the exam or knows helpful info plz pitch in ...

Can u please elaborate more on what the CTs Xrays and pics where about ?
Were the CTs and Xrays of normal structures and they asked u something about pathology related to them ? or they were about anatomy ?

did u see a lot of anatomy Qs ? (and after doing the exam would u advice reading FA+Qbanks only, for gross anatomy?)

Is Underground clinical vignette anatomy a good book to read ?

were the neuroanatomy pics difficult (does HY NA pics suffice?)

Did they bring a lot of Microbiology pics? (and if, whats ur advice?)

I Know they are TOO MANY Qs, but if u can help plz do ...

Thx a lot
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
120 Posts
There seems to be a lot of comments from people who have taken the exam recently talking about too many Pics!!!
Any one who've had the exam or knows helpful info plz pitch in ...

Can u please elaborate more on what the CTs Xrays and pics where about ?
Were the CTs and Xrays of normal structures and they asked u something about pathology related to them ? or they were about anatomy ?

did u see a lot of anatomy Qs ? (and after doing the exam would u advice reading FA+Qbanks only, for gross anatomy?)

Is Underground clinical vignette anatomy a good book to read ?

were the neuroanatomy pics difficult (does HY NA pics suffice?)

Did they bring a lot of Microbiology pics? (and if, whats ur advice?)

I Know they are TOO MANY Qs, but if u can help plz do ...

Thx a lot
Yes i gave exam recently and it was highly integrated with pictures/cts/xrays but i assure you that if youve studied properly they wont give you a hard time. I didnt used any special source for them. CT xrays i studied from kaplan lectures and books and for pictures mostly the ones in pathoma or first aid and in uworld and i scored decent in step 1. Majorly because most of the question stems have usually clues for the answer and you dont have to rely completely on the picture for the question. If you can go through some picture resources that can be a good idea . There were some micro images too in the exam.
Neuro was highly tested so should use a good resource for that.
I would recommend atleast doing abdomen thorax from KLN because it would cover alot of cts etc and other highyield stuff , rest you can rely on FA n uworld.
I have no idea about that anatomy book you mentioned
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
184 Posts
Yes i gave exam recently and it was highly integrated with pictures/cts/xrays but i assure you that if youve studied properly they wont give you a hard time. I didnt used any special source for them. CT xrays i studied from kaplan lectures and books and for pictures mostly the ones in pathoma or first aid and in uworld and i scored decent in step 1. Majorly because most of the question stems have usually clues for the answer and you dont have to rely completely on the picture for the question. If you can go through some picture resources that can be a good idea . There were some micro images too in the exam.
Neuro was highly tested so should use a good resource for that.
I would recommend atleast doing abdomen thorax from KLN because it would cover alot of cts etc and other highyield stuff , rest you can rely on FA n uworld.
I have no idea about that anatomy book you mentioned
Did u find some pictures that were the same on the nbme? In general did u find some qs on the real exam that u exactly found before?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
120 Posts
Did u find some pictures that were the same on the nbme? In general did u find some qs on the real exam that u exactly found before?
Maybe a few , most of the questions had the similar concepts i was tested before in uworld , but in a different way. Dont freak out much about pictures. Use a resource like web path for a quick review and focus mainly on your study material :) You will be fine
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
There seems to be a lot of comments from people who have taken the exam recently talking about too many Pics!!!
Any one who've had the exam or knows helpful info plz pitch in ...

Can u please elaborate more on what the CTs Xrays and pics where about ?
Were the CTs and Xrays of normal structures and they asked u something about pathology related to them ? or they were about anatomy ?

did u see a lot of anatomy Qs ? (and after doing the exam would u advice reading FA+Qbanks only, for gross anatomy?)

Is Underground clinical vignette anatomy a good book to read ?

were the neuroanatomy pics difficult (does HY NA pics suffice?)

Did they bring a lot of Microbiology pics? (and if, whats ur advice?)

I Know they are TOO MANY Qs, but if u can help plz do ...

Thx a lot
Hi,
I took the exam yesterday. I don't think there were a lot of crazy pictures. Nothing really surprising, nothing that one couldn't understand based on a good preparation on FA/UW.
I remember having chest Xray of COPD, CT of the brain or gross brain - normal pics. For neuroanatomy I feel the pics in the various NBMEs, UW & FA are enough. They want you you to think (you need to have the knowledge obviously)!
NOt many anatomy pics, at least in my test. There were some anatomy Qs that I wasn't sure about (mastication muscles, muscles in the pelvis).
I had micro's pics, but the vignette was definitely helpful - I remeber a couple of qs showing multinucleated cells - HSV - and the vignette was enought for the answer (painful genital vescicle or something like that).

The exam is doable, you have to DEEPLY understand everything that is in FA, and being able to apply it. There are very few one-step Qs. You always have to think! Make sure that you understand everything in FA, and you'll be fine !;)

Good luck!

Veronica
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
142 Posts
Hi,
I took the exam yesterday. I don't think there were a lot of crazy pictures. Nothing really surprising, nothing that one couldn't understand based on a good preparation on FA/UW.
I remember having chest Xray of COPD, CT of the brain or gross brain - normal pics. For neuroanatomy I feel the pics in the various NBMEs, UW & FA are enough. They want you you to think (you need to have the knowledge obviously)!
NOt many anatomy pics, at least in my test. There were some anatomy Qs that I wasn't sure about (mastication muscles, muscles in the pelvis).
I had micro's pics, but the vignette was definitely helpful - I remeber a couple of qs showing multinucleated cells - HSV - and the vignette was enought for the answer (painful genital vescicle or something like that).

The exam is doable, you have to DEEPLY understand everything that is in FA, and being able to apply it. There are very few one-step Qs. You always have to think! Make sure that you understand everything in FA, and you'll be fine !;)

Good luck!

Veronica
Thanks for guidin.So you think Exam is doable after doing FA+uworld n Patoma well??is genetics n biochem enough from kaplan??thnx
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
369 Posts
Hi,
I took the exam yesterday. I don't think there were a lot of crazy pictures. Nothing really surprising, nothing that one couldn't understand based on a good preparation on FA/UW.
I remember having chest Xray of COPD, CT of the brain or gross brain - normal pics. For neuroanatomy I feel the pics in the various NBMEs, UW & FA are enough. They want you you to think (you need to have the knowledge obviously)!
NOt many anatomy pics, at least in my test. There were some anatomy Qs that I wasn't sure about (mastication muscles, muscles in the pelvis).
I had micro's pics, but the vignette was definitely helpful - I remeber a couple of qs showing multinucleated cells - HSV - and the vignette was enought for the answer (painful genital vescicle or something like that).

The exam is doable, you have to DEEPLY understand everything that is in FA, and being able to apply it. There are very few one-step Qs. You always have to think! Make sure that you understand everything in FA, and you'll be fine !;)

Good luck!

Veronica
Thanx dear :) !! big thanx !!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
I think you can find everything in FA and UW! There were maybe 5% of Qs out of the blue, the rest was at least mentioned in FA. But FA doesn't really explain anything...so you have to use other sources in order to deeply understand all the concepts. I personally used the kaplan lectures and pathoma, but at the end I was only using FA and UW...
This exam is about understanding, obviously you need to memorize a lot as well, but this is not enough. You really need to use your brain, that's the difficult part... because after 4 blocks my brain was so ready to give up!! BUt you have to keep focused.
Make sure you understand everything in the books. Don't go crazy with million of other sources, just consolidate everything in FA during your preparation. Make sure you sleep and eat enough the day before and the day of the exam!

good good luck!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
Thanks for guidin.So you think Exam is doable after doing FA+uworld n Patoma well??is genetics n biochem enough from kaplan??thnx
FA genetics is enough. Make sure you do some excercises/questions (UW shoud be enough). Biochemistry is very concise in FA, but everything you need is at least mentioned there. The only thing is fatty acids synthesis and oxidation, that's not enough in FA, Kaplan is better. Use kaplan when you don't get a concept cristal clear.:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
367 Posts
FA genetics is enough. Make sure you do some excercises/questions (UW shoud be enough). Biochemistry is very concise in FA, but everything you need is at least mentioned there. The only thing is fatty acids synthesis and oxidation, that's not enough in FA, Kaplan is better. Use kaplan when you don't get a concept cristal clear.:)
yeah the only thing worrying me is genetics and biostats; the kaplan Q bank questions are really tough in that...i thought even the U world questions for stats were a bit tough (stats is my absolute weakest area)...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
yeah the only thing worrying me is genetics and biostats; the kaplan Q bank questions are really tough in that...i thought even the U world questions for stats were a bit tough (stats is my absolute weakest area)...
Stats in my exam was really easy. I recall a q about sensibility, one about false positive, one about number needed to treat, a couple about the type of study and one about C.I. No crazy calculations overall!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
367 Posts
Stats in my exam was really easy. I recall a q about sensibility, one about false positive, one about number needed to treat, a couple about the type of study and one about C.I. No crazy calculations overall!
okay that sounds a lot better :). I know there have been horror stories on here about really tough stats and genetics questions, so i was worried about that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
Thank you

For every one that replied u really helped ...

It seems to me that people who do the exam and R a little stressed afterward tend to over inflate things despite them doing very well ...

About biostat I read the previous comment, but I'm a little worried about it and was thinking of reading HY biostat , but do u think BRS+Qbanks R enough ?

THX
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
For every one that replied u really helped ...

It seems to me that people who do the exam and R a little stressed afterward tend to over inflate things despite them doing very well ...

About biostat I read the previous comment, but I'm a little worried about it and was thinking of reading HY biostat , but do u think BRS+Qbanks R enough ?

THX
I watched the kaplan videos for biostats, but to be honest if you understand the concepts, FA is enough.

Do plenty of Qs of stats & genetics, to make sure you got the concepts and you are fine with the calculations. Also, often the number used are the same (like 100 - etc), you could find a question with the same numbers, and you don't even need to calculate!
UW is fine, but you can find more exercises online also!

Best of luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sa3eedi

·
Registered
Joined
·
367 Posts
I watched the kaplan videos for biostats, but to be honest if you understand the concepts, FA is enough.

Do plenty of Qs of stats & genetics, to make sure you got the concepts and you are fine with the calculations. Also, often the number used are the same (like 100 - etc), you could find a question with the same numbers, and you don't even need to calculate!
UW is fine, but you can find more exercises online also!

Best of luck!
where can we find the exercises online?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17 Posts
Best source for pics in USMLE

Hey guys, Checkout the book "Dermatology for the USMLE" in Amazon.

Cover all derm topics for the boards, excellent source to score high. It has HIGH quality pics for every disease you may encounter in the USMLE's.

Bought it in amazon 5 months ago, it is awesome. A must have...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Yes i gave exam recently and it was highly integrated with pictures/cts/xrays but i assure you that if youve studied properly they wont give you a hard time. I didnt used any special source for them. CT xrays i studied from kaplan lectures and books and for pictures mostly the ones in pathoma or first aid and in uworld and i scored decent in step 1. Majorly because most of the question stems have usually clues for the answer and you dont have to rely completely on the picture for the question. If you can go through some picture resources that can be a good idea . There were some micro images too in the exam.
Neuro was highly tested so should use a good resource for that.
I would recommend atleast doing abdomen thorax from KLN because it would cover alot of cts etc and other highyield stuff , rest you can rely on FA n uworld.
I have no idea about that anatomy book you mentioned
Thank you for this. I have started doing that now.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Top