Joined
·
137 Posts
A 33-year old woman comes to the physician because she has not had a menstrual periods for 6 months. Prior to this she had normal period every 29 days that lasted 4 days. She has noted some weight gain in the past few months. She has a history of hepatitis A infection 6 years ago and had an appendectomy at age 12. She takes no medications and has no allergies to medications. Her father died of acute pancreatitis 3 years ago. Her mother is alive and well with no medical problems. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in diagnosis?
a- Amylase
b- FSH
c- Beta hCG
d- LFTs
e- TSH
After I had a careful analysis of this question, I selected option e as an answer. Because hypothyroidism can be a reversible cause of amenorrhea, however, the explanation of this question states that the correct answer is option c. The reason they mention is that every time we encounter a case of amenorrhea, we have to rule out pregnancy first. By the way I knew this fact, but why I didn't chose it was the fact that if a woman has amenorrhea for 6 months, this will mean that the size of the fetus would have been obvious and huge in case of pregnancy
). So I chose the option e as answer.
What do you guys think am I right or the kaplan q book?
why does kaplan make such questions??????????
a- Amylase
b- FSH
c- Beta hCG
d- LFTs
e- TSH
After I had a careful analysis of this question, I selected option e as an answer. Because hypothyroidism can be a reversible cause of amenorrhea, however, the explanation of this question states that the correct answer is option c. The reason they mention is that every time we encounter a case of amenorrhea, we have to rule out pregnancy first. By the way I knew this fact, but why I didn't chose it was the fact that if a woman has amenorrhea for 6 months, this will mean that the size of the fetus would have been obvious and huge in case of pregnancy
What do you guys think am I right or the kaplan q book?
why does kaplan make such questions??????????