![]() |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USMLE Step 1 Forum USMLE Step 1 Discussion Forum: Let's talk about anything related to USMLE Step 1 exam |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey,
First and foremost, I have like 3 years before I could be able to appear in the Match, so I have 3 years of relatively free time, and I want to take the steps during this period. I've got really weak basics, and I need to know how to treat this problem. Should I stick to textbooks and build up my basics thoroughly OR stick to review books and Qbanks and that would be enough to accomplish this mission and BUILD my fundamentals, not only review them? As I just said, I will take the steps during this time, so eventually my goal is to act as good as I dream at in the steps. Sorry if this question has been asked several times before, but I really have special circumstanses (much time, weak basics) and I am really so confused about this. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Appleton & Lange's Review of Epidemiology & Biostatistics pdf | ezguy | USMLE Step 1 Forum | 0 | 05-12-2015 10:08 PM |
Appleton & Lange's Review of Epidemiology & Biostatistics for the USMLE | Kmathew | USMLE Step 1 Forum | 1 | 05-12-2015 08:56 PM |
i have finished kaplans , im still weak in basics . should i read it second time or go with fa uworld ? | elMuchacho | USMLE Step 1 Forum | 1 | 03-29-2015 11:11 PM |
how effective is it to review weak subjects(according to nbmes) | ballers | USMLE Step 1 Forum | 2 | 03-22-2014 06:00 PM |
weak in renal & musculoskeletal | wsams | USMLE Step 1 Forum | 5 | 02-24-2012 02:07 PM |
|